Is it too much to say being a Democrat in 2020 is to bear a cross of mixed emotions, anxiety, and perhaps, a loss of purpose? I think any of us who join, follow, or volunteer with the DFL or the Fighting 41st, are striving to build a just, equitable society. But we see that work eroded by adverse forces seemingly beyond our control. It’s time to wrest back control.
When I began coming to the senate district meetings I was searching for effective, worthwhile ways to help my community. Voting was unfulfilling. It had never been enough. Now, after two years of being involved, I still feel unfulfilled. This is not to say I have wasted my time. I have met many passionate, caring, hardworking people. I have shared my story and I spent many nights in 2018 knocking on doors, which I believed was the “gold standard” for organizing and building power. But, the nagging in my head tells me I am still not satisfied. How effective have I really been? How can I maximize my impact here at the Fighting 41st? And don’t the problems I see in society demand that I work harder, or more effectively to build the power necessary for our leaders to seriously tackle society’s problems?
Before I discovered how the DFL organizes on a senate district level, my interactions with politics were almost entirely focused on national politics. As a young person I was not very politically involved. I was, however, politically aware, and I consumed plenty of news. I had campaigned for Barack Obama, helping to raise money for the campaign throughout the summer of 2008. But that relationship never led me into the deeper and more important insight about political involvement. I was yearning to apply the history I learned about society in a useful, positive way, but my initial campaign work never placed me on the pipeline to my local DFL unit. I spent many years without an outlet for my activism. After the 2018 caucus I discovered the Fighting 41st, the cornerstone for democratic power near me.
I imagine this story is similar for many young people. We all travel along our own intellectual journey, continually searching for our place in society. Democrats all have a story of why we feel passionate about Democratic values, and we all seek to improve the society we live in.
Perhaps I was naïve in my younger years, but the dirty secret I have discovered about politics is that it is only partially about ideals, but more importantly about power. This insight has been burning in my brain since I started my involvement with the Fighting 41st, but it has only recently crystallized. In hindsight, I have witnessed a clear example. I went canvassing with Connie Bernardy before the midterms in 2018. I watched as she knocked on a door of a couple who supported Jeff Johnson (Tim Walz’s Republican opponent), who she knew would still split the ticket and vote for her. She knocks on their door every cycle and she knew what they cared about. She was building power one person at a time and she was willing to listen to anyone.
And here the rubber meets the road, so to speak. I feel that I need to search for more effective and meaningful ways for our senate district to organize.
At first, I thought maybe I needed to find a different group to volunteer with, maybe Indivisible, or a local climate group. But, to me, SD41 seems uniquely situated to build long-term power on the local level. Of course, the pandemic will not allow us to canvass this year. But even in normal years, our canvassing through the VAN system only haphazardly reaches those who have already voted. Phone banking is another option, but it is becoming increasingly tough to reach people. There is also social media engagement. But the shallow nature of social media rewards someone for a post or a hot take on an article, rather than for a concrete action. We can create daily action items that focus on calling legislators. Yet, they are only effective for certain types of offices. Most often daily action items are nationally focused, which means they will not engage voters in meaningful organizational objectives. Driving turnout in local and state elections, as many of our members know intimately, is the road to change that we can effect.
This brings me back to Senate District 41. Our SD41 has an excellent track record of informing members about local elections, including non-partisan elections. We have committed community members, who really understand what is happening locally. Since joining, the local relationships I have made motivated me to further action with the DFL.
What I want, is for every other Democrat in SD41 to develop and depend on the relationships he or she has with other Democrats in the district. I think our road this deeper form of participation in the Senate District DFL should begin with a precinct organizing system.
I came across this idea in a recent book, called Politics is for Power, but the National Democratic Training Committee also has resources dedicated to it, which you can check out here. The basic framework involves recruiting precinct organizers to reach out to each household in their area. For example, in my city of Columbia Heights, we have eight precincts, so we would find eight precinct captains who could each manage a group of organizers. Each organizer would be responsible for reaching out to a reasonable number of households in their immediate area. The benefit of a system like this, is that we would have concrete, meaningful ways to plug members into our senate district. We could establish a pipeline for local leaders to identify and activate people who might otherwise never find a way to marshal their politics toward a purpose.
Yes, it would take time and effort to grow a system like this. But that is the reason it must be the senate district that takes on a project of this scope and vision. Campaigns do not have that capability, though they can help plug in volunteers.
I would like to start this year by having precinct captains write a letter to a number of the households around them, offering to listen to their opinions and help them get involved. Not only is this a social-distancing organizational technique, workable in the time of Covid-19, it is also personal. And it is hyper-local. While this might be slightly out of my comfort zone — and maybe yours too — I believe the gains will far out-weigh the pain.
I want to hear what you think about SD41’s role in organizing and building power. Please email me at email@example.com. I would also like to follow this blog with some concrete actions, including interviewing some of the people doing sustainable organization in our district to really learn what motivates people to turn their politics into a purpose.
This is our time to build sustainable power in Senate District 41.
By Phillip Wynn, Senate District 41 Member
Personal note: I spent three Saturdays in January door-knocking for one of the candidates in Iowa. That gives me no special credentials for writing this post, but thought I’d just put it out there.
This post is in two parts. First is about the media reaction to Iowa. The second is my opinion about what we Democrats should take away from the Iowa experience.
Any of you who’ve raised children will recognize the struggle a parent faces in trying to teach their children delayed gratification. A toddler wants what it wants now now NOW! It takes a big step in maturation for a child to learn to postpone getting something it wants. It isn’t easy to do, as witnessed by the fact that many adults seem to have trouble with the concept of delayed gratification.
This seems especially the case with many members of the news media. I have to wonder: Did many of them struggle with learning delayed gratification when they were toddlers? That would explain a lot of the media reaction to the delayed results from the Iowa caucuses.
Full disclosure: I stopped watching TV news a few years ago, and that was one of the best decisions I’ve ever made. Online news is better, and newspapers are still the best news source, in my opinion.
Still, even online I could tell that the morning after the caucuses, the big story was about what a horrendous fail the Iowa result had turned into. Run for the hills! The Democrats can’t even manage a dinky caucus! It’s a win for Trump! Dear God, we’re all going to DIE!
So as I’ve suggested, the best way to approach such stories is to regard the news media as acting like a frustrated toddler, stamping its foot and shouting, “I want it NOW!”
For you see, in its typical laziness and boneheadedness, the news media already had a narrative ready to go, the only thing missing being some blanks to fill in for the winners and losers of Iowa. Iowa was highlighted as the dramatic beginning of a dramatic horse race. Significant money had been invested in flashy graphics for the TV people, the “best” reporters had been assigned to the scene, theme music for the show had already been written and recorded. The only thing left was for the caucus-goers to do their thing, while the “reporters” zoned out into their cellphones, already knowing what they were going to say and how they were going to say it, the only mystery being who would play which role.
Instead what we got was one of the most dramatic displays of media ineptitude and cluelessness in the Trump era. The caucus-goers and the Democratic party didn’t play the role that had been assigned to them! We didn’t have results for the show that night! What are we going to do? Well, you know the one thing they wouldn’t do: look in the mirror for who to blame. So instead it’s those darned Democrats. They messed up! We were there and ready to cover it … and THEY messed up!
Sure, the app and all that. Yeah, there were problems. But if the media overreacted like a spoiled child, that doesn’t excuse Democrats buying into their bull, and overreacting themselves, taking on the narrative that the problems with the Iowa caucus constituted a dark day for the Democrats.
Baloney. Pure, unadulterated baloney. And the negativity of defeatism as well. We Democrats need to do all we can, inside ourselves and in our interaction with others, to avoid feeding this defeatism, because it will ensure defeat in November. There’s no need here to go into who the real winners and losers were in Iowa, especially because, as history tells us, the results aren’t dispositive in any case. And by that metric, the sane reaction to the Iowa situation among Democrats should be “meh”.
I’ve seen a lot of commentary about how bad the Iowa caucuses are, how Iowa shouldn’t be first, how it’s not representative, etc. etc. etc. In the here and now, I can’t see how such talk is anything other than a complete waste of time. The arguments against the role of the Iowa caucuses in the campaign are independent of the problems seen this year, and the two shouldn’t be conflated. Iowa is now behind us, no longer exists in the reality of the campaign NOW.
Let the news media continue to obsess about Iowa. They’ll move on soon enough, to cover the next thing in the campaign with the same tried-and-true and yet clueless approach.
We Democrats need to move on, too. Iowa? Meh.
Greetings all Senate District 41 members. Early primary voting at your city hall and by mail has begun! That means that our precinct caucus is just around the corner. The caucus is the meeting where we select delegates and set values for the DFL and the lead-in to our senate district’s convention in March. The delegates we nominate here get to represent us at the next conventions, perhaps even the state convention in June.
Minnesotans are the first in the nation to begin voting in the Democratic primary this year. And although Iowans will see their votes counted first, attending our caucus will be crucial for more than just picking a presidential candidate, here are my top three reasons to attend:
- Put your fingerprints all over the issues you care about! If you care about climate, healthcare, etc. then this is your chance to organize with other caucus members who care just as deeply as you do about the outcomes. You, the citizen, should be in the driver’s seat of your local policies and caucusing is the vehicle for getting those policies represented in the DFL party platform. The caucus is important for funneling ideas and movements up the chain to our party’s leaders. Bringing a resolution (or several) to the caucus is fairly easy, check out this guide from OurMNFuture.org/resolutions. They have an excellent summary of the process and plenty of template resolutions ready to bring straight to the caucus.
- Meet fellow Democrats that are not just political junkies, but political actors! These are your neighbors, our kids attend the same schools, and our caucus attendees are committed to building movements around Democratic values. You could watch the news ‘til your eyes turn to mush, but you won’t really understand your community until you mix it up with other local DFL’ers. I promise that you will come away from the caucus feeling motivated, excited to get involved, and impressed with your Fighting 41 community.
- Help build the movement that will dump Trump! It is incredible to think that we have lived through three years of chaos, lies, dysfunction, and corruption. November 2020 cannot come fast enough. The caucus is where our ball gets rolling, where we activate new DFL members and motivate long-time attendees. This is your chance to join the blue wave that will dump Trump and spark a new progressive era.
When is the caucus? On February 25th at 7pm
Where? If you live in Columbia Heights, St.Anthony, or Hilltop you caucus at Columbia Academy: 900 49th Ave NE. Columbia Heights, MN 55421.
If you live in Fridley, Spring Lake Park, or New Brighton, you caucus at Fridley High School: 6000 W. Moore Lake Dr. NE. Fridley, MN 55432
Safety. They keep telling us it is about safety. But in August they went after immigrants who came here for medical care that they need to live, telling them to go back, that they had overstayed. To go back to countries that lack the medical specialists they need. To countries where they will die. If the administration feels that such people are a threat to our safety, they are cowards.
But they are more than cowards. They don’t care about the people who would die. It was never about safety. It was about flexing their muscles and showing that they could control those who are powerless and unimportant. Because in their mind, power and importance go hand-in-hand. They are important because they have power, and they have power because they are important.
Thankfully, this story has a happy ending. Like so many of the current administration’s decisions, ordinary people, the “powerless,” the “unimportant,” came together to push back against their efforts. The House Oversight Committee responded to these concerns by holding hearings. And the administration backed down.
It’s a story we have seen play out over and over in the last two years. The administration puts profit before people, and people come together to push back. In an era where those in positions of power believe that people exist to serve the government and not the other way around, it is important that people who care about their neighbors and their communities work together to uphold the principles of basic human decency. We have seen this in action, not only in this case, but in the opposition and outcry in response to the border wall, internment, family separations and other acts.
On October 9, DFL Senate District 41 will be holding a forum on Immigration. We encourage you to attend to learn more about current events in this area and what can be done about them.
Event Information: October 9th, 6 PM
St. Anthony Village City Hall & Community Center: 3301 Silver Lake Rd NE, Saint Anthony, Minnesota 55418
Greetings fellow 41st and 37th district members, summer is upon us once again.
Following the news these days might make you want to crank up the air conditioning and sequester inside. But luckily our esteemed forty-fifth president can’t put a tariff on the best darn picnic in the Twin Cities. And so, as we have every year since Jesse Ventura was governor, we’ll gather for our annual picnic once again on August 9th, 2019.
Not only is this an excellent opportunity to support your local DFL candidates, but more importantly it’s a perfect opportunity to rub elbows with the community members that elect those candidates. Yes, you will definitely hear the going’s-on from your local representatives. And yes, you can stuff yourself silly on burgers, sweets, and lemonade. But, it’s a rare treat to enjoy a summer day the way it was meant to be enjoyed while making some serious societal progress towards relegating number Forty Five to the presidential history books.
Last year we heard from candidates for governor and more down the ticket, and we had a silent auction that included some local historic political items, as well as some old-fashioned fun. So prepare yourself! And now with each cringe-worthy news story you read, you can instead look forward to the rockin’ political picnic of the summer!
Carolyn Laine has written an excellent bill that needs your help to clear out of committee. Time is running down at the state senate for SF 614, a housing bill aimed at helping manufactured home communities.
The Agriculture, Rural Development and Housing Finance Committee, currently headed by Republicans, meets for its final time on March 20, 2019.
Follow the link below and call the Republicans on the committee to let them know we want action on affordable housing!
This bill has a unique origin. Since
1991 half of the manufactured home communities in the Twin Cities have closed with
the property sold to developers. Gentrification, poverty, and stigma swirl around
the motivations for closing these communities. The
closure of Lowry Grove (located in our own St. Anthony) shone a spotlight
on a special contradiction for these residents: they typically own the
manufactured home, but they rent the property beneath it.
When Lowry Grove’s owner decided to sell to a developer, those residents had one slim recourse: to buy that land. Even with the help of a non-profit housing developer to bring a $6 million counter offer, the St Anthony City Council rejected the residents’ offer. Lowry Grove has a complicated story that someone far more qualified explains here.
This saga has led to Senator Laine’s
effort to update and strengthen the laws around the sale of manufactured home property.
The goal is to change the power dynamic between renters, developers, and local
officials by encouraging cooperative buying.
There is plenty of precedent for
these cooperative communities, including one in Fridley. Yet, I believe it is
impossible to separate the discussion of Lowry Grove and the wider affordable
housing crisis, which inflicts serious financial pain on middle and lower-income
families, especially renters.
This pain is lived daily by the 40
percent of American renter households that are rent burdened (meaning they
spend over 30 percent of income on rent). From 2001 to 2015, average rental prices
have increased 32 percent, while average incomes decreased slightly (ruminate on that for a moment). Even worse, 17
percent of renter households spent over half
of their income on rent. African American and senior households were even more
likely to be rent burdened.
We all know that the rent or the
mortgage is the first and most essential bill we pay. Mathew Desmond, writer of
Evicted, points out that lack of affordable
housing “sits at the root of a host of social problems, from poverty and
homelessness to educational disparities and health care.”
Encouraging affordable options like manufactured homes can help avoid tragedies like Lowry Grove. Senator Laine and Mark Koran (Republican from North Branch) say in a recent Star Tribune opinion article that the total cost for manufactured homes, per unit, is about 60 percent lower than high-density apartments and cost about 85 percent less for the city to maintain.
Senator Laine’s current bill not only gives residents time to make a cooperative offer on their place of residence but puts the onus on property owners to inform those residents that they plan to sell the property. This bill has been referred to committee, but it may need your help to get bipartisan support. I see this bill as a truly common-sense filter between the powerless and the powerful, a basic Democratic value. As members of SD 41, we can all agree that home provides the backbone for a healthy family and community. I hope this bill becomes one piece of a much larger effort towards affordable housing in Minnesota.
Fifty years ago I picked up a copy of Look magazine, which had in it photographs taken during the just completed voyage of Apollo 8 to the moon. Look magazine was the “also-ran” to the more famous Life magazine, both being large glossy magazines full of color photographs. I was then a fifteen year-old science fiction fan, so naturally I anticipated eagerly the photographs from Apollo 8 that I knew would be in the magazine.
There for the first time I saw the photograph since known as “Earthrise”, which shows the Earth in the distance, surrounded by an endless black nothingness, and in the foreground the desolate and forbidding lunar landscape. I wasn’t prepared for what I saw. To a science fiction fan, Earth was the place you left, a kind of boring classroom globe, minus the national boundaries, of course. Instead, I saw something that sent a chill up my spine that I still remember.
Over the past half century, at times I’ve pondered why that picture struck me so. I’ve come to the realization that the best explanation is in an analogy. It is as though I had been blind from birth, and had at some point gained my sight. For the first time, I had seen the face of my mother.
And she is beautiful beyond words.
“Viewed from the distance of the moon, the astonishing thing about the Earth, catching the breath, is that it is alive.” So wrote the biologist Lewis Thomas, words quoted at the start of James Lovelock’s book “The Ages of Gaia”.
During the beginnings of the space program in the 1960s, Lovelock, also a biologist, had been hired by NASA to help with the search for life on Mars. While working on that, Lovelock realized that life on a planet could reveal its presence indirectly via its atmospheric composition. Earth’s atmosphere contains an enormous amount of free oxygen, which couldn’t be sustained over time without its being part of the life cycle. Why not? Because oxygen is a very reactive element, meaning that it sort of “wants”, very badly, to be combined with other elements into chemical compounds (the best example being water, H2O).
It is life that continually sustains the oxygen in the Earth’s atmosphere. And that isn’t the only way that the presence of life affects the Earth. Without here going into the details (plenty of books etc. out there on the subject), life doesn’t simply adapt to its environment; on a planetary scale, it also adapts the environment to itself, helps to render the Earth a place where life can not only exist, but thrive.
This view of the Earth and the biosphere as an inextricably bound-together whole Lovelock named Gaia, after the Greek Earth goddess. This idea was slow to gain acceptance, especially in the scientific community, and it remains controversial. What isn’t controversial is that, even in the minimalist view of the idea, the biosphere does exhibit feedback mechanisms that act to regulate the environment in ways conducive to life.
When people look at the Earthrise photograph, many tend to remark on how fragile the Earth looks, like some beautiful but delicate Christmas ornament (an appealing image perhaps because the picture was taken on Christmas Eve). It’s therefore unsurprising that the photograph was an inspiration to the budding environmental movement of the time. The Earthrise photograph helped to foster the idea that human beings with their out-of-control pollution were threatening the delicate biosphere depicted in the photograph, and that we needed to work to heal the natural world. Others mocked the idea that human activity was affecting the environment, or that we could threaten the existence of life itself.
I’m here to tell you that both attitudes are wrong, because both proceed from a flawed premise. Nature isn’t something that stands apart from us, because we humans ARE PART OF IT. Therefore, of course human activity affects the environment, our common environment.
But does human activity threaten life itself, as some environmentalists claim?
No, and here’s why. First and foremost, the fragility of the biosphere seen in the Earthrise photograph is illusory, a product of judging things by comparative size. In the Permian extinction event 250 million years ago, 96 percent of all marine species, and 70 percent of terrestrial vertebrates, were wiped out. Many scientists think this extinction event was caused by the unexplained release of massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere (much larger than the current human contribution). Compared to the Permian extinction, the die-off after the asteroid collision that killed the dinosaurs was a mere blip.
And yet, in both cases, life survived. The biosphere, it turns out, is a lot tougher than it looks. And we humans are a lot smaller in the scheme of things than we like to admit. The biologist Lynn Margulis once remarked, “The planet takes care of us, not we it.” Far from the biosphere, Gaia, being something we need to protect, “we need to protect ourselves from ourselves … Gaia, a tough [expletive deleted], is not at all threatened by humans.”
Quite the contrary, and here’s the point of revisiting Earthrise a half century later, and both the insights and the illusions that famous photograph fostered. As we’ve seen just this past year with massive wildfires and monster hurricanes, global warming caused by our pumping of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is not only real, but poses an increasing danger, not to life on Earth, but to HUMAN life on Earth.
And that’s the takeaway point. We must stop pumping carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the environment, not because it will destroy life on Earth, but because it will ultimately destroy US.
Remember that Gaia acts, through feedback mechanisms, to foster the continuance of life. Not, it must be emphasized, human life alone.
Meaning, long before we humans are able to destroy life on Earth, Mother Earth WILL take care of us.
When I was in 7th grade in the public school I attended in the South, I was targeted for bullying – and worse – for being gay.
Thing is, I wasn’t gay. Not then. Not now.
But I was somehow “different”, mostly because I was an unathletic bookworm. (The best picture of the “reasoning” involved can be seen in the courtroom scene in the movie Idiocracy, a movie I cannot recommend highly enough.)
Did that make me sympathetic to non-heteros? Sadly, no, at least at first. In fact, it reinforced in me the latent homophobia imprinted in my psyche by the prevailing culture. In a story, sadly, all too common among gay people themselves, I was determined to show to others, and myself, that I “belonged”, that I wasn’t one of “them”.
What brought me out of that dark place was nothing special. It’s called growing up, and lived experience, and education. Looking back, the best way I can describe it is a certain enlargement of the heart, like what happened to the Grinch in the end.
That personal history informs my feelings about the race for Minnesota Attorney General. I really wish it didn’t. For one thing, that race has compelled me to read up on the history of a certain Doug Wardlow. That’s something I rarely do, since I usually try to steer clear of reading about Republicans, given that doing so nowadays tends to make me nauseous.
And it turns out it’s a good thing I hadn’t had to until now. Because when I did, because of my personal history I got a taste of what a lot of women felt listening to Brett Kavanaugh.
Now a lot of you know that some have tried to turn Wardlow’s DFL opponent Keith Ellison into some Democratic version of Kavanaugh. What I found in my research is that Wardlow fits that bill far better. In fact, not only are the allegations against Ellison pretty thin, the allegations against Wardlow are actually better attested than those against Kavanaugh (not that I don’t credit the latter).
Last Saturday the Pioneer Press reported that interviews with Wardlow’s classmates when he attended Eagan High School in the 1990s reveal him to have been a homophobic bully. He especially targeted his classmate Ryan Durant, who at one point attempted suicide (Durant himself doesn’t blame Wardlow for that, although he does call him the “worst” bully of the group that targeted him for his orientation).
According to the newspaper, Durant’s “account is corroborated by several other students.” They include a female friend of Durant, whom Wardlow attacked with lesbian slurs, “even though she was not gay.” Among Durant’s tormentors was a then friend of Wardlow … who it later turns out IS gay, and who has corroborated Durant’s account in every particular.
I think now you can see how this really, really resonates with me personally.
Durant admits that people can change after high school. Yeah, also sounds familiar. But Durant goes on to say that Wardlow’s public positions on gay rights show that his views have NOT changed.
Item: While clerking at the Minnesota Supreme Court, Wardlow authored a conservative blog which asserted that “marriage should be reserved for the union of one man and one woman.”
Item: Wardlow was elected to the Minnesota House in 2010, and there supported a Republican-led effort to amend the state constitution via referendum to define marriage as exclusively between one man and one woman. That referendum lost in 2012, and Wardlow lost his seat.
Item: And as if all that weren’t enough, Wardlow was recorded earlier this year as promising to fire every Democratic attorney in the AG office as his first official act if elected.
Naturally, Wardlow has denied everything except the last. He’s also tried to downplay – or refused to discuss – his earlier public record on LGBTQ issues.
In other words, Wardlow is just one more lying, hypocritical Republican.
Maybe I’m showing my partisan bias here, but in comparing Wardlow and Ellison, I have no problem identifying where the preponderance of damning evidence lies. And it infuriates me when I hear that some Democrats are considering not voting in the AG race.
Really? Is your memory so short that you don’t remember where the purity police got us in November 2016?
All you readers of this post, I’d like you to ask yourself, and anyone you know on Facebook or in person who is OK with such foolishness, the following question:
If, due to your “principled” refusal to choose in the Minnesota AG race, you help to elect him to the AG office, thereby turning that office into a bastion of hard-right Republicanism …
If you contribute by your action or inaction to that result, tell me, was your “purity” worth the price?
Democrats value diversity. Republicans want us all to be the same, a nightmarish version of themselves.
That’s why I say vote next Tuesday, not just to make a difference, but to KEEP a difference.
By Phillip Wynn, SD 41 member
The last two years have been an overwhelming trial for many Americans. It began with the surprising, and disastrous, election of a sociopathic criminal to the highest office in the land, a man – if we dare dignify him by such a term – as devoid of competence as he is of respect for our democratic institutions. His administration – if we dare dignify it by such a term – has since featured one rank indecency after another, while its “leader” and his fascistic enablers in the Republican party have celebrated each successive atrocity with sadistic glee.
The decent people of this country, including some Republicans, have regarded this carnival of depravity with mounting horror. As there seems no one able or willing to curb the madness, emotions among these decent people have run the gamut from shocked disbelief, to helpless anger, and, for many, hopelessness in the face of apparently unstoppable evil.
The last emotion has particularly affected many women who watched, horrified, as a man credibly accused of sexual assault was elevated to a seat on the highest court in the land, while his accuser was not only deluged with insult and vituperation, but even forced to flee her home with her family out of fear for her life. Her searing testimony before a kangaroo court of unsympathetic and hostile men reawakened in millions of women excruciating memories of their own past sexual traumas.
So it’s no wonder that many Americans, that many Democrats, feel depressed and angry as we count down to election day 2018.
All the more reason, I say … to ACT!!!
Action is the cure I promised in the title. Here I know personally whereof I speak. I have known both anger and depression – and a bit of past trauma as well.
And, as many a clinician will tell you, and as I am telling you now – based on personal experience – ACTION is one of the best treatments available to everyone.
But what can I do, you say? In a minute. But first, at the risk of rubbing your nose further in what is depressing you, let me remind you that YOU, all of you, are called to action not just for yourself. That is the Republican way.
No. You are challenged to look beyond yourself, to ACT because of:
The victims of sexual assault, whose reluctance to come forward has just now been shown to be fully warranted; the millions cruelly victimized by our health not care; the mentally ill and disabled, often cast aside like so much garbage; the millions who have to work two jobs, or more, in an often vain effort to check their slide into poverty; the people of color who can get shot, in their own homes, for the crime of existing; our own children – our CHILDREN! – who now at their school have to worry more about getting shot than passing a test; the children torn from their families by a fascistic police force motivated by a crude, nightmarish dream of white supremacy; and many, many other things, the last but not least being the climate ravages that are currently sweeping the globe, while our “leaders” stick their heads in the sand and muse on how much more money can be given to the rich.
THEY are the ones for whom you must soldier past your anger and your depression. THEY are the ones on whose behalf you must direct your anger in a good cause, a righteous cause.
So, for those in Senate District 41 who want to act, I have a suggestion. This Saturday, starting at 11 o’clock, at the home of our state representative Connie Bernardy (2810 Linden Drive in New Brighton), she and other DFLers running for office, including my representative in the U.S. House of Representatives, Betty McCollum, will be gathering for a door knocking in our district.
If this isn’t your thing, there are other ways you can contribute. For instance, my wife Pam will be cooking a dish for that event. You could do that, or something else. Because there’s always something a volunteer can do to help the cause, in this what is, beyond any doubt, easily the most important election year in my lifetime, bar none.
Don’t let the events of the last few weeks leave you so discouraged that you feel it’s too hopeless to do anything. That’s exactly what Trump and the Republicans want you to feel. Do you really want to do what THEY want you to do? That being … nothing?
Remember the words of Martin Luther King: “We must at times accept finite disappointment, but never lose infinite hope.”
If not this Saturday, find a way to act before November 6. Build up your hopes to overmatch the sum of your fears. You will be better for it … and so will your country … and so will your fellow Americans.
— Phillip Wynn
Primaries are over! Not all my candidates won, and I’m betting that not all of yours did either. But Minnesota saw an amazing election turnout, and we can now shift the focus from ourselves to our actual opponents. As a newcomer to the senate district DFL, I have been really energized by the excitement and commitment I’ve seen this summer. Here are a few of the ideas that I want to keep top-of-mind from now until election day.
Minnesota is super-duper competitive this year
I think this is one of the first years in recent memory that Minnesota is consistently making national political news. Four out of the eight house districts — the Eighth (around Duluth), the Third (Northwest of the Twin Cities), the First (along Minnesota’s Southern border), and the Second (Southeast of the Twin Cities) — could all feasibly swing either way according the FiveThirtyEight house election model. Our governor’s race, which is rated with a slight advantage for Tim Walz, is a must win for Minnesota Democrats, and the Minnesota House is the 2018 battleground for our state’s political power. I say this to emphasize that while November creeps into view, more people will be getting involved, tuning in, and ready to vote. And every neighbor, friend, or stranger with which I can share my perspective on the Democratic Party represents one more potential vote. What’s more, we have a lot to brag about this year: 2018 has fielded a more diverse and energetic set of candidates than ever before, and they are hitting the pavement and working the grassroots to sell our message.
Democrats are evolving with the times / Republicans are dancing to the same old song
Democrats are the Big Tent Party, which means Republicans will always win on simple messaging, but don’t let that get you down! We can walk and chew gum at the same time! As the folks at the Poor People’s Campaign point out, our society is due for a moral revival. They see a “complex relationship between and across the systemic racism, persistent poverty, the war economy, and its inevitable militarism, and ecological devastation.” And lest you think this is just a response to the venerable #45, this is a call for justice across society that includes the Democratic Party. Wrestling political power away from those who embody our worst instincts is priority number one but pushing for real reform requires empathy and compassion. These are values that Democrats should express in our conversations, debates, and policies and from which our political leaders shouldn’t run away. So, embrace the complexity and explain our values. This, I hope, will show voters we have a real passion for solving America’s problems.
Don’t let the Trump show keep you in the dumps, get involved!
As Howard Zinn notes, “It is the present that haunts a serious spinner of futuristic tales.” Certain days you can almost taste the dumpster-fire fumes emanating from the White House and it seems that the character of our national debate could seamlessly unwind into a dystopic science fiction novel. So, if some days our present feels a bit too unreal, than our answer must be people working in local communities, interacting and coalescing around the change in which they believe.
My involvement with the senate district has changed my perspective on the importance of grassroots, local groups. Not only do they provide a place to stay updated about various elections, but building local relationships pushes you to learn about what is important to other community members and expands your opportunities to get involved in ways that truly represent your ideals. I’ve also come to believe that many local issues affect you more directly than national ones. And yet, even while it can be impossible to tear your gaze from the daily onslaught, our moral revival will surely come from our efforts on the ground: canvassing, organizing, and listening.